Reedy v. Lumpkin
Petitioner: Charles Reedy
Respondent: Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 1:2024cv00069
Filed: January 16, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Docket - Austin
Referring Judge: Mark Lane
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Justine Isabelle Caedo Tan on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Justine Isabelle Caedo Tan added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Tan, Justine Isabelle)
February 26, 2024 Filing 12 NOTICE of Filing; affidavits from Travis County by Charles Reedy (cc3)
February 26, 2024 Filing 11 Letter/Correspondence from Charles Reedy. (cc3) Modified on 2/28/2024 (cc3).
February 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles Reedy and Directing Respondent to Answer Petition. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3)
February 21, 2024 Filing 9 Filing fee received in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 1518 (cc3)
February 20, 2024 Filing 8 Letter/Correspondence from Charles Reedy. (cc3)
February 20, 2024 Filing 7 Letter/Correspondence from Charles Reedy. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)(cc3)
February 5, 2024 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Charles Reedy. (cc3)
January 31, 2024 Filing 5 Letter/Correspondence from Charles Reedy. (cc3)
January 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DEFICIENCY ORDER for Petitioner to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3) Modified on 1/23/2024 to updated text (cc3).
January 22, 2024 Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Charles Reedy. (cr5)
January 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER (dated 05/11/2023) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cr5)
January 16, 2024 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee DUE), filed by Charles Reedy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Memo)(cr5)
January 16, 2024 Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5)
January 16, 2024 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (cr5)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reedy v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Reedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bryan Collier
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Represented By: Justine Isabelle Caedo Tan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?