Sanchez v. Lumpkin
| Eduardo Sanchez |
| Bobby Lumpkin |
| 3:2021cv00308 |
| December 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Kathleen Cardone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Certified and Transmitted Record on Appeal USCA #22-50053 to US Court of Appeals re #10 Notice of Appeal. Pending acceptance from USCA for attorney access. (dc)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF APPEAL by Eduardo Sanchez. Per 5th Circuit rules, the appellant has 14 days, from the filing of the Notice of Appeal, to order the transcript. To order a transcript, the appellant should fill out a #(Transcript Order) and follow the instructions set out on the form. This form is available in the Clerk's Office or by clicking the hyperlink above. (dc)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response by Eduardo Sanchez. (dc)
|
|
Filing 8
FedEx Mailing of #7 Order on Motion to Compel, #4 Memorandum Opinion and Order, #5 Order (dc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/27/2022: #1 Delivered 1/21/22) (dc).
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING AT MOOT #6 Motion to Compel Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (em)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Compel by Eduardo Sanchez. (dc)
|
|
Filing 5
FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (dc)
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eduardo Sanchez. Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (dc)
|
|
Filing 3
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eduardo Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit a, #3 Exhibit b, #4 Exhibit c)(dc)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (dc)
|
|
Motions No Longer Referred: #1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis (mt)
|
|
Text Order REFERRING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the United States Magistrate Judge. Entered by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (KC)
|
|
MOTION REFERRED: referred #1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referral Judge: Anne T. Berton. (mt)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eduardo Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit a, #4 Exhibit b, #5 Exhibit c)(dc)
|
|
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Berton (dc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sanchez v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eduardo Sanchez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin | |
| Represented By: | Edward L. Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
