Jane Envy, LLC v. Sam Moon Trading Enterprises, Ltd. et al

Plaintiff: Jane Envy, LLC
Defendant: Daniel S Moon, David Moon, Samuel S Moon, Moon Brothers Management, Inc. and Sam Moon Trading Enterprises, Ltd.
Case Number: 5:2014cv00065
Filed: January 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: San Antonio Office
Presiding Judge: David A. Ezra
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2016 Filing 105 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND VACATING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 97 Report and Recommendations, GRANTING 103 MOTION to Dismiss Its Remaining Claims Upon Which Summary Judgment Has Not Been Granted filed by Jane Envy, LLC, DENYING 101 MOTION for Reconsideration of Court's Order granting in part summary judgment filed by Infinite Classic Inc., Baek H. Kim, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 91 MOTION for Sanctions against Infinite Classic, Inc. and Baek H. Kim filed by Jane Envy, LLC. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (aej)
February 26, 2016 Filing 93 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 69 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (aej)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jane Envy, LLC v. Sam Moon Trading Enterprises, Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Envy, LLC
Represented By: William B. Nash
Represented By: Jason W. Whitney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel S Moon
Represented By: Daniel L. Moffett
Represented By: Kirt S. O'Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Moon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samuel S Moon
Represented By: Daniel L. Moffett
Represented By: Kirt S. O'Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moon Brothers Management, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel L. Moffett
Represented By: Kirt S. O'Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sam Moon Trading Enterprises, Ltd.
Represented By: Daniel L. Moffett
Represented By: Kirt S. O'Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?