Billy Julius Porter v. Kathryn Joiner
| Billy Julius Porter, Jr. |
| Kathryn Joiner and United States Of America |
| 5:2018cv00682 |
| July 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| San Antonio Office |
| David A Ezra |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (rg) |
| Case assigned to Judge David A. Ezra. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rg) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Kathryn Joiner. (Gilligan, James) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Substitute Party Notice of Substitution and Application for Order Thereon by Kathryn Joiner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Memo in Support, #3 Exhibit A - Certification of Joseph Rodriguez)(Gilligan, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Kathryn Joiner (Filing fee $400), filed by Kathryn Joiner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Petition, #2 Exhibit State Court Documents, #3 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplement Supplement to Civil Cover Sheet)(Gilligan, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
