Vineyard v. Lumpkin
Jay B. Vineyard |
Lorie Davis and Bobby Lumpkin |
5:2020cv01077 |
September 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fred Biery |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Remark: Copy of Petition & Memo in Support with Order to Respond, e-mailed to the AG's Respondents. (wg) |
Filing 12 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO ANSWER PETITION re #2 Memorandum in Support filed by Jay B. Vineyard, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jay B. Vineyard. Respondent must answer the petition within thirty (30) daysafter receiving this Order. The Court will electronically serve the designated AG representative, Edward L. Marshall, Assistant Attorney General, Chief of the Criminal Appeals Division, at edward.marshall@oag.texas.gov, as well as Laura Haney at laura.haney@oag.texas.gov. The Court requests that the parties file their Consent/Non-Consent Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (wg) |
Filing 11 Filing fee received in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 500055898 (wg) |
Filing 10 ORDER DENYING re #9 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jay B. Vineyard. Petitioner shall submit to the Clerk of the Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the necessary $5.00 amount in payment of fees. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (wg) |
Filing 9 PRO-SE MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jay B. Vineyard. (wg) |
Filing 8 ORDER, that the Court will construe the Motion to vacate re #6 MOTION to Vacate filed by Jay B. Vineyard, as a supplemental memorandum which shall be taken into consideration when evaluating the merits of Petitioners allegations. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (wg) |
Filing 7 DEFICIENCY ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order, petitioner must submit to the Court either the required filing fee of $5.00 or a completed application to proceed IFP. If the petitioner submits an IFP application, it must include a current institutional trust fund account statement showing deposits and balances to petitioners institutional account for the previous six months. re #6 MOTION to Vacate filed by Jay B. Vineyard, The Clerk shall send a Blank IFP Application to the Petitioner with a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (wg) |
Filing 6 PRO-SE MOTION to Vacate under Fed. Rule Civil procedure 12(b)(4) filed by Jay B. Vineyard. (wg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Jay B. Vineyard re #4 Order, (wg) |
Filing 4 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that these two cases currently pending before this Court5:20-CV-1077-FB and 5:20-CV-1080-FBare consolidated. This case, Case No. 5:20- CV-1077-FB, shall be the lead case, and all filings shall be made in this case ONLY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that cause number SA-20-CV-1080-FB is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (wg) |
Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Jay B. Vineyard. (dtg) |
Filing 2 Memorandum Brief in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Jay B. Vineyard. (dtg) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jay B. Vineyard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Cover Letter, #3 Copy of Envelope)(dtg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (dtg) |
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RAMDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE FRED BIERY. (dtg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.