Sinno v. Lumpkin
| Mohamad F. Sinno |
| The State of Texas, Bobby Lumpkin, Hon. Stephanie R. Boyd, Hon. Joe D. Gonzales, Warden Jimmy Webb, Executive Director Bryan Collier, Regional Director David Blackwell and Hon. Ken Paxton |
| 5:2021cv00206 |
| March 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Fred Biery |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE (REPLY) to #4 Response to Habeas Petition by Mohamad F. Sinno. (De Los Santos, Reynaldo) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Bobby Lumpkin.(Wissinger, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jennifer Wissinger on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Jennifer Wissinger added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Wissinger, Jennifer) |
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO ANSWER PETITION. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (mgr)
|
| Regenerated (doc #1) to Respondent. (mgr) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5.00 receipt number 500056981), filed by Mohamad F. Sinno. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt)(dtg) Modified TEXT on 3/4/2021 (dtg).***PETITION WAS SEALED, TAB L CONTAINS PERSONAL IDENTIFIERS.*** |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (dtg) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE FRED BIERY. (dtg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
