Turner v. Lumpkin
| Clarence Turner |
| C. Lofton and Bobby Lumpkin |
| 5:2021cv00405 |
| April 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order GRANTING #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. Respondent's deadline for filing an answer or other responsive pleading is extended to Friday, July 23, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg5)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with Brief in Support by Bobby Lumpkin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Manojlovich, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 10
Correspondence from Clarence Turner. (bc)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jessica M. Manojlovich on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Jessica M. Manojlovich added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Manojlovich, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO ANSWER PETITION -- Marshall and Haney received notice electronically. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (bc)
|
|
Filing 6
DEFICIENCY ORDER--ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall forward to Petitioner an application to proceed in forma pauperis and that Petitioner, within twenty (20) days of the filing of this Order, must submit either the filing fee of $5.00 or a completed application to proceed IFP together with an IFP data sheet certified by one of the officers in the law library, for this case to proceed. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (bc)
|
|
Mailed out Deficiency Order #6 along with a Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis to the Plaintiff at the TDCJ-Hughes Unit (bc)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. The U.S. Clerk is directed to accept Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (ECF No. 1) without prepayment of the required $5.00 filing fee. Petitioner may disregard the Court's previous order filed May 18, 2021 (ECF No. 6) directing him to file a properly supported IFP motion. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg5)
|
|
Filing 7
PRO SE MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clarence Turner. (bc)
|
|
Filing 5
PRO SE MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clarence Turner. (bc)
|
|
Filing 4
DEFICIENCY ORDER --Petitioner, within twenty (20) days of the filing of this Order, must submit either the filing fee of $5.00 or a completed application to proceed IFP together with an IFP data sheet certified by one of the officers in the law library, for this case to proceed. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 3
Case Opening Letter to Clarence Turner. (nm)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clarence Turner. (nm)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Clarence Turner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(nm)
|
|
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad. (nm)
|
|
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JASON K. PULLIAM. (nm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
