Cano v. Lumpkin et al
Ruben Alvino Cano |
Blake Lamb and Bobby Lumpkin |
5:2022cv00231 |
March 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Orlando L Garcia |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER DENYING #11 Motion for Discovery. It is further ORDERED that Petitioners request for counsel is also DENIED Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr) |
Filing 13 State Court Records Filed. (Attachments: #1 1 DA01 Memorandum Opinion, #2 2 DA02 Judgment, #3 3 DA03 Mandate, #4 4 DA04 Appellant's Brief, #5 5 DA05 State's Brief, #6 6 DA06 PDR, #7 7 DA07 CR, #8 8 DA08 Supp CR, #9 9 DA09 RR 1, #10 10 DA10 RR 2, #11 11 DA11 RR 3, #12 12 DA12 RR 4, #13 13 DA13 RR 5, #14 14 DA14 RR 6, #15 15 DA15 RR 7, #16 16 SHCR-01 (writ), #17 17 SHCR-02 (action taken), #18 18 SHCR-02 (misc. doc.), #19 19 SHCR-02 (misc. doc.), #20 20 SHCR-02 (misc. doc.), #21 21 SHCR-02 (supp cr), #22 22 SHCR-02 (writ))(Wissinger, Jennifer) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Bobby Lumpkin.(Wissinger, Jennifer) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Discovery by Ruben Alvino Cano. (mgr) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jennifer Wissinger on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Jennifer Wissinger added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Wissinger, Jennifer) |
Filing 9 ORDER DENYING #8 Motion for Discovery Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Discovery by Ruben Alvino Cano. (mgr) |
Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO ANSWER PETITION. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr) |
Regenerated doc #1 and #2 to Respondent (mgr) |
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. The U.S. Clerk is directed to accept Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (ECF No. 1) without prepayment of the required $5.00 filing fee. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg5) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ruben Alvino Cano. (mgr) |
Filing 5 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES - the Court ORDERS that these two cases currently pending before this Court5:22-cv-231-OLG and 5:22-cv-254-OLGare hereby consolidated. Case No. 5:22-cv-231-OLG, shall be the lead case, and all future filings shall be made in that case. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rg) |
Filing 4 DEFICIENCY ORDER-- It is therefore ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order, Petitioner must submit to the Court either the required filing fee of $5.00 or a completed application to proceed IFP. If Petitioner submits an IFP application, it must include a current institutional trust fund account statement showing deposits and balances to Petitionersinstitutional account for the previous six months.. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr) |
Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Ruben Alvino Cano. (dtg) |
Filing 2 Memorandum in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Ruben Alvino Cano. (dtg) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ruben Alvino Cano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copies of Cover Letters, #3 Copy of Envelope)(dtg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (dtg) |
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO CHIEF JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA. (dtg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.