Moreno v. Lumpkin
| Juan A. Moreno |
| Bobby Lumpkin |
| 5:2022cv00497 |
| May 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Xavier Rodriguez |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order DENYING #6 Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Petitioner failed to present a "good faith" non-frivolous issue for appeal as required for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg5)
|
| Filing 6 PRO-SE MOTION to proceed In Forma Pauperis on appeal by Juan A. Moreno. (wg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Juan A. Moreno. Per 5th Circuit rules, the appellant has 14 days, from the filing of the Notice of Appeal, to order the transcript. To order a transcript, the appellant should fill out a #(Transcript Order) and follow the instructions set out on the form. This form is available in the Clerk's Office or by clicking the hyperlink above.***NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED PER 5TH CIRCUIT'S INSTRUCTIONS.*** (Attachments: #1 TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM USCA5)(dtg) |
|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT, Pursuant to this Courts Dismissal Order of even date herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by Petitioner Juan A. Moreno is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue in this case. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, Petitioner Juan A. Morenos petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of jurisdiction. This Court DENIES Petitioner a certificate of appealability. See Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing 2254 Proceedings; andAll remaining motions, if any, are DENIED, and this case is now CLOSED. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
|
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Juan A. Moreno. (dtg) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Juan A. Moreno. (Attachments: #1 Additional Exhibits to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Copy of Envelope)(dtg) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad. (dtg) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE XAVIER RODRIGUEZ. (dtg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moreno v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Juan A. Moreno | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin | |
| Represented By: | Edward L. Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
