Flores v. Lumpkin
| Felix Alberto Flores |
| Bobby Lumpkin |
| 5:2022cv00977 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order DISMISSING as MOOT #7 Motion for Reconsideration entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. The Court's previous Order of Dismissal has been vacated and these proceedings reopened. See Dkt. No. 8. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg5)
|
| Filing 9 Filing fee received in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 1207 (mgr) |
| Mailed Order (doc #8) and a 2254 Application to Petitioner. (mgr) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion to Withdraw Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. Within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order, Petitioner must clarify his request for federal habeas corpus relief by filing an amended 2254 application for habeas corpus on the forms to be provided so that the amended application clearly and concisely states his allegations and relief sought. (mgr)
|
| Filing 7 PRO-SE MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order Dismissing Case by Felix Alberto Flores. (wg) |
| Filing 6 PRO-SE MOTION to Withdraw Petitioner's Voluntary Dismissal filed by Felix Alberto Flores. (wg) Modified on 10/17/2022 (mgr). |
|
Filing 5
***VACATED PURSUANT TO ORDER (DOC #8) DATED 10/14/2022*** ODER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr) Modified on 10/17/2022 (mgr).
|
| Filing 4 ***DOCUMENT WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO ORDER (DOC #8) DATED 10/14/2022***PRO-SE MOTION to Dismiss by Felix Alberto Flores. (wg) Modified on 10/17/2022 (mgr). |
|
Filing 3
DEFICIENCY ORDER, It is ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order, Petitioner must submit to the Court either the required filing fee of $5.00 or a completed application to proceed IFP. The Clerkof the Court is directed to forward Petitioner this Courts standard IFP application. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg)
|
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Felix Alberto Flores. (dtg) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Felix Alberto Flores. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Cover Letter, #3 Copy of Envelope)(dtg) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (dtg) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO CHIEF JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA. (dtg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Flores v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Felix Alberto Flores | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin | |
| Represented By: | Edward L. Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
