Ricky Clay Jones v. Bobby Lumpkin
Ricky Clay Jones |
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director and Bobby Lumpkin |
5:2022cv01014 |
September 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Jason K Pulliam |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Reset Deadlines: Bobby Lumpkin answer due 11/18/2022. (rg) |
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. Respondent shall have until Friday, November 18, 2022, to file an answer or other responsive pleading. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg5) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer With Brief in Support by Bobby Lumpkin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Petitioner Cover Letter-Jones)(Tan, Justine Isabelle) |
Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO ANSWER PETITION - The Respondent in this case is represented by the Office of the Attorney General (AG). In accordance with a standing agreement between the Court and the AG, the Court electronically served the designated AG representative, Edward L. Marshall, Assistant Attorney General, Chief of the Criminal Appeals Division, atedward.marshall@oag.texas.gov, as well as Laura Haney at laura.haney@oag.texas.gov. Respondent must answer the petition within thirty (30) days after receiving this order. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (rg) |
Text Order GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. The U.S. Clerk is directed to accept Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (ECF No. 1) without prepayment of the required $5.00 filing fee. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg5) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad. (rg) |
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rg) |
Filing 7 Case electronically transferred in from Southern District of Texas; Case Number 1:22-cv-00119. |
Filing 6 ORDER entered. The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court, Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(rnieto, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 9/15/2022.] |
Interdistrict transfer to WDTX - San Antonio Division. Case transferred electronically, filed. (rnieto, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 9/15/2022.] |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (EfrainGarcia, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 9/15/2022.] |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ricky Clay Jones, filed. (EfrainGarcia, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 9/15/2022.] |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma PauperisMotions referred to Ignacio Torteya, III. by Ricky Clay Jones, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/29/2022. (EfrainGarcia, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 9/15/2022.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Ricky Clay Jones.(EfrainGarcia, 1) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 9/15/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.