Reyes v. Lumpkin
| Gabriel Reyes |
| Bobby Lumpkin |
| 5:2022cv01331 |
| December 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
State Court Records Filed. (Attachments: #1 WR-76,899-02 SHCR-02, #2 WR-76,899-02 Supp. SHCR-02, #3 WR-76,899-02 Action Taken Sheet)(Wawrzynski, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss with Brief in Support by Bobby Lumpkin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wawrzynski, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stephanie N. Wawrzynski on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Stephanie N. Wawrzynski added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Wawrzynski, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO ANSWER PETITION - The Respondent in this case is represented by the Office of the Attorney General (AG). In accordance with a standing agreement between the Court and the AG, the Court electronically served the designated AG representative, Edward L. Marshall, Assistant Attorney General, Chief of the Criminal Appeals Division, at edward.marshall@oag.texas.gov, as well as Laura Haney at laura.haney@oag.texas.gov. Respondent must answer the petition within thirty (30) days of this order. Petitioner may file any reply to an answer or other pleading filed by Respondent on or before twenty (20) days after Petitioner receives the answer or other pleading. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rg)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. The U.S. Clerk is directed to accept Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (ECF No. 1) without prepayment of the required $5.00 filing fee. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg5)
|
|
Filing 3
Case Opening Letter to Gabriel Reyes. (dtg)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gabriel Reyes. (dtg)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Gabriel Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Copy of Cover Letter, #4 Copy of Envelope)(dtg)
|
|
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (dtg)
|
|
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA. (dtg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reyes v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Gabriel Reyes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin | |
| Represented By: | Edward L. Marshall |
| Represented By: | Stephanie N. Wawrzynski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
