Vasquez v. Lumpkin
Edward Lopez Vasquez |
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin |
5:2023cv01279 |
October 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fred Biery |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Bobby Lumpkin answer due 12/29/2023. (mgr) |
Text Order GRANTING #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Fred Biery. Respondent shall file an answer or other responsive pleading on or before Friday, December 29, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg5) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Bobby Lumpkin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Morris, Jennifer) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jennifer Wren Morris on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Jennifer Wren Morris added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Morris, Jennifer) |
Filing 10 ORDER TO ANSWER within 30 days of this order. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (kg) |
Filing 9 Case Opening Letter by Edward Lopez Vasquez. (mgr) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (mgr) |
Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) |
Filing 8 Case electronically transferred in from the Southern District of Texas-Houston Division; Case Number 4:23-cv-00263. |
Filing 7 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(JacquelineMata, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/10/2023.] |
Interdistrict transfer to the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on October 10, 2023., filed. (JacquelineMata, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/10/2023.] |
Filing 6 Letter from Edward Lopez Vasquez requesting copy of docket sheet, filed. Copy of docket sheet sent by USPS as requested. (ghassan, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/10/2023.] |
Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number HOU114750, filed. (jsuchma, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/10/2023.] |
Filing 5 RESPONSE TO #3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, filed by Edward Lopez Vasquez. (ClaudiaGutierrez, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/10/2023.] |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Edward Lopez Vasquez. Within thirty days from the date of this order Petitioner shall show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed. Petitioner shall also either pay the filing fee of $5.00 or submit a property supported motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with a copy of his trust fund account statement. Petitioner is warned that if he fails to comply on time the Court may dismiss this case for want of prosecution without further notice. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(jdav, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/10/2023.] |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/10/2023.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Edward Lopez Vasquez. (RachelWillborg, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/10/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.