Floyd v. USA et al
| Anthony Floyd |
| USA, IRS and Major Robert De Los Santos |
| 6:2018mc00302 |
| October 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER re #6 Order on Motion to Dismiss. The Clerks Office is directed to administratively close the above-referenced case. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jgb)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING #1 Motion to Quash. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioners Petition to Quash Third Party Summons, (ECF No. 1), is DISMISSED for want of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jgb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jgb)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Petition to Quash Third-Party Summons by Robert De Los Santos, IRS, USA. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A)(Page, Stephanie) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee received in the amount of $47, receipt number 600023741 (tb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Floyd. (tb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash 3rd PARTY SUMMONS by Anthony Floyd. (tb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
