Lee v. Lumpkin
| Mark Edward Lane and Mark Edward Lee |
| Bobby Lumpkin |
| 6:2020cv01005 |
| October 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad) |
Filing 14
ORDER: Petitioners application for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time-barred. Certificate of Appealability is Denied. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to #10 Order to Show Cause, by Mark Edward Lee. (lad) |
| Filing 12 Filing fee received in the amount of $5, receipt number 600027378 (lad) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 12/2/2020. It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner shall, on or before December 2, 2020, show cause why his habeas corpus application should not be dismissed as time-barred. Failure to respond to this Order will result in the dismissal of Petitioners application for habeas corpus relief.Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (bw)
|
| Filing 9 Case Transfer Letter. (bw) |
| Filing 8 Case electronically transferred in from Southern District of Texas; Case Number 2:20-cv-00267. |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bw) |
| Interdistrict transfer to the Western District of Texas, Waco Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 10/30/20, filed. (amireles, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/30/2020.] |
|
Filing 7
OPINION AND ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to the Western District of Texas, Waco Division; All pending motions are DENIED as moot and are subject to renewal after the case is transferred.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B Libby) Parties notified.(amireles, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/30/2020.]
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (RochelleLimon, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/30/2020.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Mark Edward Lane. A filing fee of $5.00 for habeas corpus petitions or a fully complete application for leave to proceed or Parties notified. Submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Notice of Compliance due by 11/27/2020, filed. (RochelleLimon, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/30/2020.] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (RochelleLimon, 2). [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/30/2020.] |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of on Inman re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,, filed.(RochelleLimon, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/30/2020.] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File an Order for DiscoveryMotions referred to Jason B Libby. by Mark Edward Lane, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/18/2020. (RochelleLimon, 2). [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/30/2020.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Mark Edward Lane. (Attachments: #1 Continuation, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(RochelleLimon, 2) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/28/2020: #4 Incident Report) (RochelleLimon, 2). [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/30/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
