Dyfan, LLC v. Target Corporation
| Dyfan, LLC |
| Target Corporation |
| 6:2021cv00114 |
| February 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 100 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Nadiia Loizides for Nadiia Loizides ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14654284) by on behalf of Dyfan, LLC. (Loizides, Nadiia) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by James M. Lennon for Derek Dahlgren ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14654249) by on behalf of Dyfan, LLC. (Lennon, James) |
| Filing 12 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Dyfan, LLC. (Lennon, James) |
| Filing 11 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Unopposed) by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Greene, Gilbert) |
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Matthew S. Yungwirth for Target Corporation. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Christopher J. Tyson for Target Corporation. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mm6)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Gilbert Andrew Greene on behalf of Christopher J. Tyson ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14547697) by on behalf of Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Greene, Gilbert) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Gilbert Andrew Greene on behalf of Matthew S. Yungwirth ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14547473) by on behalf of Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Greene, Gilbert) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Greene, Gilbert) |
|
Filing 8
Standing Order Regarding Filing Documents Under Seal and Redacted Pleadings in Patent Cases. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. as of 2/12/2021. (bot1)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dyfan, LLC. Target Corporation served on 2/5/2021, answer due 2/26/2021. (Lennon, James) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Target Corporation. (am) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Dyfan, LLC. (Lennon, James) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Lennon, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14441174), filed by Dyfan, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lennon, James) |
| Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (am) |
|
Filing 4
Standing Order Regarding Notice of Readiness v2.1. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (am)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dyfan, LLC v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Matthew S. Yungwirth |
| Represented By: | Christopher J. Tyson |
| Represented By: | Gilbert Andrew Greene |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dyfan, LLC | |
| Represented By: | James M. Lennon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
