WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. DoorDash, Inc.
| WirelessWerx IP, LLC |
| DoorDash, Inc. |
| 6:2023cv00863 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Counts |
| Derek T Gilliland |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 100 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Reset Deadlines: DoorDash, Inc. answer due 2/26/2024. (lad) |
Text Order GRANTING #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to February 26, 2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mslc)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Respond to Complaint by WirelessWerx IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 10 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #9 Notice (Other) (lad) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE Unopposed Notice for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by WirelessWerx IP, LLC (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WirelessWerx IP, LLC. DoorDash, Inc. served on 12/20/2023, answer due 1/10/2024. (Ramey, William) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER AND ADVISORY, REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland. Signed by Judge David Counts. (lad)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to DoorDash, Inc. (bw) |
| All parties shall flatten all documents before e-filing and shall comply with the Standing Orders located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/ |
| Case assigned to Judge David Counts. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bw) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Notice of Related Cases by WirelessWerx IP, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ramey, William) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Parties by WirelessWerx IP, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by WirelessWerx IP, LLC. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-18222500), filed by WirelessWerx IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. DoorDash, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: WirelessWerx IP, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DoorDash, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
