Scott v. McLennan County Texas et al
| Bennie Daryl Scott |
| McLennan County Texas, Parnell McNamara, Ricky Armstrong, Devon Colquette, Joebani Hernandez, Raygan Woodard, Gary Krenek, Joshua Davis, Omar Pargas, Eugene Kritzer, Jerry Dickerson, Perry Hayden and Michelle Goebel |
| 6:2024cv00135 |
| March 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Alan D Albright |
| Derek T Gilliland |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Billy Clark for Bennie Daryl Scott. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (lad)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Billy Clark ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 1216) by on behalf of Bennie Daryl Scott. (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Receipt). Motions referred to Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (slm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 1217), filed by Bennie Daryl Scott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS44, #2 Receipt)(slm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
