Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 8:2025cv03379
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Pretrial Service:
Jack Townsend
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
(HC) Bland v. Warden
as 2:2025cv02802
Petitioner:
Joshua Davis Bland
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melvin Devost v. Dale Davis, et al
as 25-2615
Plaintiff:
MELVIN DEVOST
Defendant:
DALE DAVIS, JOSHUA DAVIS, MATTHEW DOWIS and others
Croskey et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11523
Plaintiff:
David Croskey, Michael Cross, Mary Crouch and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Galena, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2025cv02454
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
Galena, Kansas, City of, Galena Police Department, Ashley Qualls-Groves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis (PS) v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 1:2025cv02379
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw - Diversity - Breach of Warranty
Davis (PS) v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 1:2025cv02381
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davis (PS) v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2025cv02376
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Davis (PS) v. Four Points by Sheraton Flushing
as 1:2025cv02374
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
Four Points by Sheraton Flushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
