In Re: Administrative Subpoena
Defendant: U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
Movant: Walgreen Co.
Case Number: 1:2012mc00043
Filed: October 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Accomack
Presiding Judge: James C. Cacheris
Presiding Judge: Ivan D. Davis
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: Motion Re: 37 Objections to Magistrate Judge's Ruling or Recommendation re 32 Order on Motion to Seal, Order on Motion to Compel, filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 12/21/2012. (stas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Administrative Subpoena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: Walgreen Co.
Represented By: Abid Riaz Qureshi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
Represented By: Bernard G. Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?