Riddick v. Call et al
Leroy S. Riddick |
D. Call and Ruth Smith |
1:2019cv00042 |
January 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
Anthony J Trenga |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Prisoner Consent Form by Leroy S. Riddick. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dest, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER- It is hereby ORDERED that the complaint be and is conditionally filed pending compliance with the requirements of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that the plaintiff is assessed a filing fee of$350.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) and an administrative fee of $50.00; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is conditionally granted to the extent that plaintiff need not prepay the filing fee at this time nd it is further ORDERED that plaintiff particularize and amend his complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 2/19/2019. (see Order for further details)(dest, ) (copy mailed as directed in the Order) |
Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt mailed to Leroy S. Riddick. (dest, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leroy S. Riddick. (dest, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against D. Call, Ruth Smith, filed by Leroy S. Riddick. (Attachments: #1 Prisoners Database, #2 Envelope)(dest, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.