Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Demmerick Brown v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENRICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Demmerick Eric Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, DAVID A. ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, GEORGE M. HINKLE and others
Brown v. Clarke et al
as 1:2022cv01122
Plaintiff:
Demmerick E. Brown and Denrick Eric Brown
Defendant:
Harold W Clarke, David A. Robinson, George M Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Denrick Eric Brown, Demmerick Eric Brown and Demmerick E. Brown
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David A. Robinson, George M. Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Jamison v. Mark Amonette
as 22-6313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL W. JAMISON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK AMONETTE, Virginia Department of Corrections Chief Medical Director and PAUL OHAI, Doctor, Dillwyn Correctional Center
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, NATARCHA GREGG, MSA, RD, State wide Dietitian for VADOC, DANA RATLIFFE, Warden, Dillwyn Correctional Center and others
Ali v. Call et. al.
as 1:2019cv00735
Defendant:
D. Call, R. Smith and R.E. Fisher
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Hakim Ali
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddick v. Call et al
as 1:2019cv00042
Defendant:
D. Call and Ruth Smith
Plaintiff:
Leroy S. Riddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Clark et al
as 7:2018cv00504
Defendant:
L. Mason, Mr. Allen, M.E. Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel W Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meadows v. Call
as 2:2018cv00323
Petitioner:
Wayne Edward Meadows
Respondent:
D. Call
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winston v. Call et al
as 2:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
LeAnthony Winston
Defendant:
D. Call, T. Ford and D. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
