Ervin v. Hatworth et al
| Benjamin Ervin, Jr |
| Hatworth, Bhaginath and Jones |
| 1:2019cv00686 |
| May 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Claude M Hilton |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDERED that this action be and is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.If plaintiff wishes to appeal this decision, he must file a written notice of appeal with the Clerk's Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A written notice of appeal is a short statement evincing a desire to appeal this Order and noting the date of the Order plaintiff wants to appeal. Plaintiff need not explain the grounds for appeal until so directed by the Court. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 6/21/2019. (lcre, )(c/s per ORDER)
|
| Filing 5 Mail sent to Benjamin Ervin, Jr. Returned as Undeliverable. (pmil, ) |
| Filing 4 Acknowledgment of Receipt and mailed to pro se plaintiff. (klau, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Benjamin Ervin, Jr. (klau, ) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Benjamin Ervin, Jr. (klau, ) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Bhaginath, Hatworth, Jones, filed by Benjamin Ervin, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Prisoner Data)(klau, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
