Abdulkareem v. Barr et al
| Hussein Ahmed S. Abdulkareem |
| Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Commander Bailey, James McHenry, M. Yvonne Evans, Farmville Detention Center, Executive Office of Immigration Review, Officer Harkins, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Matthew T. Albence, Officer Fritz Sejuste, William Barr, Secretary of the DHS Chad Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Farmville Detention Center, VA, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) |
| 1:2020cv00980 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDERED that counsel submit any ftirther request for relief in motion form. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 09/11/2020. (dvanm, )
|
| Filing 10 Letter to Judge Leonie M. Brinkema. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Sun, Hyung Gyu) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #7 Motion for TRO, and it is hereby ORDERED that petitioner promptly serve process on respondents, who will be afforded the standard amount of time in which to respond to the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. No. 1].Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 08/31/2020. (jlan)
|
| Filing 8 Memorandum in Support re #7 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Emergency Habeas Relief filed by Hussein Ahmed S. Abdulkareem. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B)(Ludwig, David) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Emergency Habeas Relief by Hussein Ahmed S. Abdulkareem. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ludwig, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Hyung Gyu Sun on behalf of Hussein Ahmed S. Abdulkareem (Sun, Hyung Gyu) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Pro hac vice. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 8/26/20. (klau, )
|
| Notice of Correction re #4 Proposed Summons. The filing user has been notified that the Clerk do not issue summons for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus case. (klau, ) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), by Hussein Ahmed S. Abdulkareem. (Ludwig, David) |
| Filing 3 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Julie Ann Goldberg and Certification of Local Counsel David Ludwig Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-7368578. by Hussein Ahmed S. Abdulkareem. (Ludwig, David) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), by Hussein Ahmed S. Abdulkareem. (Ludwig, David) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema and Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. (klau, ) |
| Notice of Correction re [1-2] Civil Cover Sheet, The filing user has been notified that document [1-2] is an incorrectly saved PDF fillable form and has been removed. The filing user was directed to refile the document. (klau, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0422-7361909.), filed by Hussein Ahmed S. Abdulkareem. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-N, #2 Document filed in error and removed re Civil Cover Sheet)(Ludwig, David) (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/21/2020) (klau, ). Modified text on 8/21/2020 (klau, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
