Thomas v. Walgreen Co. et. al
| Dana Thomas |
| Walgreen Co., Jane Doe and John Doe |
| 1:2022cv00466 |
| April 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
| Patricia Tolliver Giles |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney; and it is further ORDERED that the law firm of MichieHamlett, PLLC and Heather E. Zaug, Esq. are withdrawn as counsel of record for Plaintiff Dana Thomas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 6/24/2022. (nneb)
|
| Filing 3 First MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Dana Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Zaug, Heather) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony Greene on behalf of Dana Thomas (Greene, Anthony) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. (nneb) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8365245.), filed by Walgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Letter Cover Letteer, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Errata Federal Disclosure Statement, #4 Letter Cover Letter to Clerk of State Court, #5 Exhibit Notice of Filing A Notice of Removal)(Turrietta, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
