Traish v. Walgreen Co. et al
| Wajdi A Traish |
| Walgreen Co. and Rachel M Jang |
| 1:2023cv01423 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Patricia Tolliver Giles |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Objection to #7 Designation Expert Witnesses filed by Walgreen Co.. (Turrietta, James) |
| Filing 10 Rule 26 Disclosure by Walgreen Co.. (Turrietta, James) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Rachel M Jang, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney) (Sbro) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons by Wajdi A Traish. (Kearney, James) |
| Filing 7 Designation Expert Witnesses by Wajdi A Traish. (Kearney, James) |
| Filing 6 Rule 26 Disclosure by Walgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Privilege Log)(Turrietta, James) |
| Filing 5 Rule 26 Disclosure by Wajdi A Traish. (Kearney, James) |
Filing 4
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b)Upon consideration of the representations made in the Rule 26(f) report and proposed joint discovery plan ("Joint Discovery Plan") (Docket no. 3), and taking note of the Scheduling Order entered in this case (Docket no. 2), the court makes the following rulings:1. All discovery, including expert discovery, shall be concluded by February 16, 2024.2. The Joint Discovery Plan is approved in part and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the court. 3. At the request of the parties, the pretrial conference scheduled for Wednesday, November 22, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. is cancelled. 4. All Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) disclosures shall be completed by November 13, 2023.SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS.Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 11/02/2023. (Dcrow, )
|
| Filing 3 Proposed Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan by Walgreen Co..(Turrietta, James) |
|
Filing 2
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 11/22/2023 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/21/2024 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Telephonically before District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles. Discovery due by 2/16/2023.Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 10/23/23. (Attachments: #1 Pretrial Notice, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(pmil, )
|
| Note filed in error (Sbro) Modified on 10/23/2023 (Sbro). |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (Sbro) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9178605.), filed by Walgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter Letter to Clerk Galindo, #3 Appendix Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 Letter Cover Letter to Clerk of State Court, #5 Letter Letter to Plaintiff's Counsel, #6 Appendix Financial Disclosure Statement)(Turrietta, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
