Hernandez Martinez v. Crawford et al
| Samuel Eli Hernandez Martinez |
| Jeff Crawford, Robert Guadian, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem and Pamela Bondi |
| 1:2026cv00195 |
| January 21, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| William E Fitzpatrick |
| Anthony J Trenga |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT by Pamela Bondi, Robert Guadian, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem. (Schmidt, Robert) |
Filing 6
ORDER Granting the Petition, and it is hereby ORDERED that Respondents provide Petitioner with a bond hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1226(a) within seven days of the date of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that if Petitioner is granted bond by an Immigration Judge, Respondents are ENJOINED from denying bond to Petitioner, or from invoking the automatic stay provision pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 1003.19(i)(2). (see order for details) Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 01/27/2026. (dvanm)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Pamela Bondi, Robert Guadian, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem re #3 Order of Prisoner Service (2241),,,,, (Schmidt, Robert) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Jacob Schmidt on behalf of Pamela Bondi, Robert Guadian, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem (Schmidt, Robert) |
|
Filing 3
ORDERED that the Respondents and any of Respondents' officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, as well as other person acting in concert with them be, and the same hereby are, ENJOINED from removing the Petitioner from this judicial district pending further order of the Court; and it is further ORDERED that on or before 5:00 PM on January 27, 2026, the Respondents file either (a) a Notice indicating that the factual and legal issues presented in this Petition do not differ in any material fashion from those presented in Hernandez v. Crawford, No. 1:25-CV-01565-AJT-WBP, 2025 WL 2940702 (E.D. Va. Oct. 16, 2025) or the other opinions of this Court cited therein; or (b) an Opposition to the Petition discussing the material differences between Hernandez and this Petition; and it is further ORDERED that if the Respondents file a Notice that there are no material differences between this Petition and Hernandez, each of the substantive filings in that habeas proceeding will be incorporated into this habeas proceeding, and this Court will issue a ruling without further filings from the parties; and it is further ORDERED that if the Respondents file an Opposition to the Petition, Petitioner shall file any Reply in further support of the Petition on or before 5:00 PM on January 29, 2026. See Order for further details. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 1/22/2026. (Dest)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Tanzania Jaysura on behalf of Pamela Bondi, Robert Guadian, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem (Jaysura, Tanzania) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AVAEDC-10726614.), filed by Samuel E Hernandez Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4)(Soltis, Katherine) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick. (Dest) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
