Johnson v. Stansberry

Johnson v. Stansberry

Defendant:	Patricia Stansberry
Petitioner:	James Johnson
Case Number:	2:2009cv00330
Filed:	July 21, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Norfolk Office
County:	Petersburg City
Presiding Judge:	Mark S. Davis
Presiding Judge:	Tommy E. Miller
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 3, 2010	Filing 15 FINAL ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Patricia Stansberry, 13 Report and Recommendations. It is ORDERED that the petition be DENIED and DISMISSED. To the extent that the petition is based on Ground 1, th e alleged Due Process violation concerning fabrication of the charge, the petition is DISMISSED on the merits. To the extent that the petition is based on Ground 2, the alleged Due Process violation for lack of notice, the petition is DISMISSED on t he merits. To the extent that the petition is based on Ground 3, Petitioner's absence when his sentence was entered, the petition is DISMISSED on the merits. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 6/2/10 and filed on 6/3/10; Copy ECF to counsel and mailed to petitioner on 6/4/10. (kgri)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 3, 2010

Filing 15 FINAL ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Patricia Stansberry, 13 Report and Recommendations. It is ORDERED that the petition be DENIED and DISMISSED. To the extent that the petition is based on Ground 1, th e alleged Due Process violation concerning fabrication of the charge, the petition is DISMISSED on the merits. To the extent that the petition is based on Ground 2, the alleged Due Process violation for lack of notice, the petition is DISMISSED on t he merits. To the extent that the petition is based on Ground 3, Petitioner's absence when his sentence was entered, the petition is DISMISSED on the merits. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 6/2/10 and filed on 6/3/10; Copy ECF to counsel and mailed to petitioner on 6/4/10. (kgri)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Stansberry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: James Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia Stansberry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?