Cases 1 - 10 of 110
BANKS v. REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, et al.
as 2:2013cv01025
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, JIM SPROUT, CASE MANAGER ANESBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Realty Counseling Company et al
as 1:2013cv01784
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Realty Counseling Company, Jim Sprout, Anesburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Wise v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 13-10316
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC RICHARD WISE, also known as Eric Wise
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and WARDEN PATRICIA STANSBERRY
Samuel Harris v. Patricia Stansberry
as 12-6199
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden and ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., Chairman United States Parole Commission
Ivander James, Jr. v. Patricia Stansberry
as 11-7582
Petitioner - Appellant:
IVANDER JAMES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden, Petersburg FCC
McPartlin v. McDonald et al
as 2:2011cv00620
Plaintiff:
John Joseph McPartlin
Defendant:
Althea Roache McDonald, Ernest Ponraj and Patricia Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Payne v. Patricia Stansberry
as 11-5300
Petitioner - Appellant:
Ronnie Payne
Respondent - Appellee:
Patricia Stansberry, Warden
Charles Rash v. Patricia Stansberry
as 11-7118
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES EMANUEL RASH, a/k/a Charles E. Rash
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden
Derrick Wiggins v. Patricia Stansberry
as 11-6460
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK LAVALLE WIGGINS
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden
Melvin Baisey v. Patricia Stansberry
as 11-5066
Petitioner - Appellant:
Melvin Baisey
Respondent - Appellee:
Patricia Stansberry, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
