Rodriguez v. Hopewell School Board et al
| David Rodriguez |
| City of Hopewell, Virginia and Hopewell School Board |
| 3:2020cv00282 |
| April 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| David J Novak |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to City of Hopewell, Virginia and Hopewell School Board. **NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (sbea, ) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons by David Rodriguez. (Schulte, Tim) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by David Rodriguez. (Schulte, Tim) |
| Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $400, Receipt Number: 0422-7167720), filed by David Rodriguez. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schulte, Tim). Modified docket text on 4/20/2020. (sbea, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge David J. Novak. (sbea, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
