Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08790
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07408
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RODRIGUEZ et al v. BUCKS COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2026cv04264
Plaintiff:
MILTON DAVID RODRIGUEZ and GAMAIRA RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT, SUPERVISOR JOHN DOE #1, SUPERVISOR JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03577
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. Blanche
as 26-3698
Petitioner:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03607
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Delgado et al
as 4:2026cv04108
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Delgado and Cody Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00388
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
