Rivas-Lemus v. Henrico County, et. al.
Katerine B. Rivas-Lemus |
Henrico County, Henrico County Sheriff's Office, Michael L. Wade, Alisa Gregory and JOHN DOES 1 through 10 |
3:2021cv00528 |
August 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Alisa Gregory, Henrico County, Henrico County Sheriff's Office and Michael L. Wade. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (jpow, ) |
Filing 3 Letter from Attorney Tingen re: locating address for Defendant Michael L. Wade for the proposed summons. (jpow, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Katerine B. Rivas-Lemus. (Tingen, Jacob) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/10/2021 to upload the corrected proposed summons from filing attorney) (jpow, ). |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-7944420.), filed by Katerine Beatriz Rivas-Lemus. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A: ICE Detainer Request, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B: Release Order, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C: Lifted ICE Detainer Request)(Tingen, Jacob) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (jpow, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.