Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Singleton v. Wade et al
as 3:2021cv00553
Plaintiff:
Mr Isiah Singleton and Isiah Singleton
Defendant:
Michael L. Wade, R. G. Goetschius, Rodney Bundick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivas-Lemus v. Henrico County, et. al.
as 3:2021cv00528
Plaintiff:
Katerine B. Rivas-Lemus
Defendant:
Henrico County, Henrico County Sheriff's Office, Michael L. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Carter v. Wade et al
as 3:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
Angela Carter
Defendant:
Sheriff Michael L. Wade and Deputy David L. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Trammell et al
as 1:2021cv00495
Respondent:
Marcus Johnson, Michael L. Wade, John Marshall and others
Petitioner:
Daniel James Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James El v. Trammell et al
as 1:2021cv00462
Defendant:
John Marshall, Bonita R Comer, Michael L. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medvedev v. Clarke
as 3:2019cv00824
Defendant:
Harold Clarke
Petitioner:
Dmitri Medvedev
Respondent:
Michael L. Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyreek Davis v. Michael Wade
as 19-1216
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN KIMPTON HONEY, JR., HENRICO COUNTY JAIL, including Deputies John Doe's 1-100 - Henrico County Jail/Henrico County Deputies and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREEK DAVIS
Abdur Rashid Mutakabbir v. Michael L. Wade
as 3:2018cv00771
Defendant:
Michael L. Wade
Plaintiff:
Adbur Rashid Mutakabbir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Wade et al
as 3:2018cv00548
Plaintiff:
Tyreek Davis
Defendant:
Henrico County Jail West/East, Honorable John K. Honey, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wade et al
as 1:2018cv00685
Plaintiff:
Rashaun Deon Smith
Defendant:
Michael L. Wade and R. Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
