Lumpkin v. Danville City Jail et al
| Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin |
| Danville City Jail, Capt. Patty, Major Martin, Sheriff and City of Danville |
| 3:2023cv00677 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark R Colombell |
| John A Gibney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Transferring Action to the Western District of Virginia) It is hereby ORDERED that this action is FILED solely for the administrative convenience of the Clerk; this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transfer all pleadings filed in this action and a copy of the docket sheet to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 10/25/2023. (Copies provided to VAWD and Plaintiff, as directed.) (Kat)
|
| Case transferred to Western District of Virginia. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (Kat) Received by the Western District of VA on 10/26/2023 and opened as case 7:23-cv-701. (Kat). |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against City of Danville, Danville City Jail, Martin, Patty, Sheriff filed by Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Kat) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
