Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lumpkin v. Danville City Jail et al
as 7:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Danville City Jail, Capt. Patty, Major Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Danville City Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Danville City Jail, Capt. Patty, Major Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv03100
Plaintiff:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DERK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00657
Defendant:
COUNSELOR PALMER, SECURITY LT. HINCHCLIFF, CO.1 D.N. HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. DERK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RICE vs. (PPS) PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, et al
as 2:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RICE
Defendant:
SGT. MILES, OFFICER HALSTEAD, SGT. Q. THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clinton Ards v. Martin, et al
as 17-20151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON ARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAJOR MARTIN, CAPTAIN DAVIDINSON, DUICE/MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Ards v. Martin et al
as 4:2017cv00388
Plaintiff:
Clinton Ards
Defendant:
Major Martin, Captain Davidinson, Duice/Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newcomb v. Martin
as 1:2015cv00992
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Newcomb
Defendant:
Major Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrence Bennett v. Mr. Baker
as 11-6353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRENCE BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. BAKER, MR. PIERSON, LANE CRIBB and others
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Bennett v. Georgetown County Detention Center et al
as 2:2010cv00762
Plaintiff:
Terrence Bennett
Defendant:
Georgetown County Detention Center, Mr Baker, Mr Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
