Cecil v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority et al
| James Lee Cecil, Jr. |
| Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority and Major Chad Kilgore |
| 7:2019cv00658 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth K Dillon |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by James Lee Cecil, Jr. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (ck) |
| Filing 4 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff James Lee Cecil, Jr. (slt) |
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC Section 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal Responses due by 10/24/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 10/1/2019. (slt)
|
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report and statement of Assets by James Lee Cecil, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Assets)(ck) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Chad Kilgore, Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority, filed by James Lee Cecil, Jr..(ck) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
