Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Cecil v. Wellpath Health Services et al
as 7:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services and Dr. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil v. Hamrick et al
as 7:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Sergeant D.W. Hamrick, Caroline Bodin and Trooper J.A. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Cecil, Jr. v. John Bowman
as 23-6654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LEE CECIL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BOWMAN and KEVIN JONES
Cecil v. Keller et al
as 7:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Major Keller, Officer L. Helmick, Mrs. D. Cockerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Cecil, Jr. v. Dr. Large
as 23-6448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LEE CECIL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. LARGE
Cecil v. Hamrick et al
as 7:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Sergeant D.W. Hamrick, Officer K-9 Handler Doe #1 and Magistrate Crysta Cultice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil v. Hulbert et al
as 7:2021cv00279
Defendant:
Dr. Charles Hulbert and Mediko, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cecil v. Winston et al
as 7:2020cv00349
Defendant:
Arthur Palmer, Thomas Bobbitt, Kevin Jones and others
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cecil v. New River Valley Regional Jail Authority et al
as 7:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Librarian Jane or John Doe, Captain Keith Fleeman, New River Valley Regional Jail Authority and others
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cecil v. New River Valley Regional Jail et al
as 7:2020cv00004
Defendant:
Captain Fleeman, New River Valley Regional Jail, Gregory Winston and others
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
