Dao v. Mr. Harold, et al
Dean Lee Dao, Jr. |
Pocahontas State Correctional Center, Mr. Harold, Nurse Ratliff, Nurse Taber and Dr. Lee |
7:2022cv00554 |
September 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Joel C Hoppe |
Michael F Urbanski |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Harold, Lee, Ratliff, Taber, filed by Dean Lee Dao, Jr.(slt) |
Filing 5 Order for Plaintiff to Respond with Amended Complaint within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 10/11/2022. (Order and 1983 form mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 4 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Dean Lee Dao, Jr (slt) |
Filing 3 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 9/23/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report and Statement of Assets by Dean Lee Dao, Jr (Attachments: #1 Statement of Assets)(slt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Pocahontas State Correctional Center, filed by Dean Lee Dao, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Offender Request Forms)(slt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.