Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Holloway et al
as 7:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Isaw Waleed Blake
Defendant:
Mr. Holloway, Mr. Harold W. Clarke, Mss. E. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cash v. Harmon et al
as 7:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Edward Cash
Defendant:
Mrs. Harmon and Mr. Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Terrence Darrelle Henderson
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Rigional Operations Chief, Rigional Adimin. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv06004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Dao v. Mr. Harold, et al
as 7:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
Dean Lee Dao, Jr.
Defendant:
Pocahontas State Correctional Center, Mr. Harold, Nurse Ratliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. HILLMAN et al
as 2:2021cv20720
Plaintiff:
RENE' D. EDWARDS
Defendant:
NOEL L. HILLMAN, ANNE E. THOMASON, JILL S. MAYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv01899
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Morrison
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Bernadette Mason, M. Connolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Headen v. Holloway et al
as 2:2021cv00604
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Clarence Headen
Defendant:
Mr. E.C. Holloway and Mr. Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company v. Martin
as 3:2021cv01657
Petitioner:
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
Respondent:
Mr. Harold J. Martin and Harold J. Martin
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
