Villaflor v. U.S. Postal Service et al
| Ernesto Villaflor |
| U.S. Postal Service, Megan Brennan, Yun Hee Lee, Ron Harrell and Julio Rodriguez |
| 2:2016cv01757 |
| November 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Kitsap |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
CORRECTED ORDER granting Defendant's 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment re 41 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff'sremaining claims are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting Defendant's 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's remaining claims are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting defendants' 19 Motion to Dismiss; defendants Julio Rodriguez, U.S. Postal Service, Ron Harrell and Yun Hee Lee are dismissed; plaintiff granted leave to amend within 21 days signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting Federal defendants' 20 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting Defendant Yun Hee Lee's 14 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint; Answer due 6/9/2017 as to Ron Harrell, Yun Hee Lee, Julio Rodriguez; by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
