Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Perez v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
as 26-5811
Petitioner: JOSE MANUEL PEREZ and Julio Rodriguez
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05712
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
US v. Rodriguez-Cumba
as 26-2000
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: JOSE JULIO RODRIGUEZ-CUMBA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00924
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2026cv01261
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1197
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00113
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Maracas Construction, Corp et al
as 9:2026cv80013
Plaintiff: PNC Bank, N.A.
Defendant: Maracas Construction, Corp and Julio Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Perez v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
as 25-8061
Petitioner: JOSE MANUEL PEREZ and Julio Rodriguez
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robinson v. Renwick
as 25-3126
Plaintiff: GINA ROBINSON, -
Defendant: DIANNE T. RENWICK, ANIL C. SINGH, LIZBETH GONZALEZ and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?