Cases 1 - 10 of 10
RODRIGUEZ et al v. JOE et al
as 2:2021cv15696
Plaintiff:
JULIO RODRIGUEZ, THE ACCES NEWS CORP, CARS CARS CARS CORP and others
Defendant:
SONY DOE JOE and NEWARK OPERATING INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12799
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ et al v. KALINOWSKI et al
as 3:2019cv21728
Defendant:
SYLVIA KALINOWSKI, PIOTR KALINOWSKI, MARIA KALINOWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO RODRIGUEZ, URIELPURE INC, MELINA RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLB TRADING, LLC v. LASLUISAS et al
as 2:2018cv04792
Plaintiff:
BLB TRADING, LLC
Defendant:
JINSON J. LASLUISAS and JULIO RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
GOMEZ et al v. TNJ ENTERPRISES INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04824
Plaintiff:
LUINY GOMEZ , EDICKSON GARCIA , JULIAN VASQUEZ and others
Defendant:
TNJ ENTERPRISES INC. , FRANK LAZAUSKUS and JOHN DOES # 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RODRIGUEZ v. WASSERMAN et al
as 2:2015cv08767
Plaintiff:
JULIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
KENNETH WASSERMAN and CAPITAL STACK FUND, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2014cv03916
Plaintiff:
JULIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RODRIGUEZ v. SUAREZ et al
as 3:2013cv02943
Plaintiff:
JULIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
AIDA SUAREZ, ABC COMPANIES 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RODRIGUEZ et al v. THE PHILADELPHIA CONTRIBUTIONSHIP et al
as 2:2012cv07194
Plaintiff:
JULIO RODRIGUEZ and ONE SMART FINANCIAL GROUP, CORP.
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA CONTRIBUTIONSHIP and DOE CORP. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
