Cargill v. United States of America et al
Quincetta Y Cargill |
United States of America, Joseph R Biden, Jr, Kamala Harris, R David Proctor, John G Camp, M Blake Milner, Jason Ward and United States Internal Revenue Service |
2:2022cv00949 |
July 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
John C Coughenour |
S Kate Vaughan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WRITTEN Consent for Participation of Law Clerks, filed by Plaintiff Quincetta Y Cargill. (ST) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Vaughan, filed by Quincetta Y Cargill. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 PROPOSED Motion for Consolidation of Related Cases, #4 Prison Trust Account Statement, #5 Letter from Filer)(ST) |
IFP deficiency corrected (ST) |
Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Incorrect IFP Form.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 8/8/2022 to correct IFP application. (cc: plaintiff w/IFP form via USPS) (ST) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Quincetta Y Cargill. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 PROPOSED Motion for Consolidation of Related Cases, #4 Letter from Filer)(ST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.