Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cargill v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08022
Petitioner:
Quincetta Y Cargill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Quincetta Cargill v. USA, et al
as 23-35185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINCETTA Y. CARGILL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R BIDEN, President of the United States of America, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States of America and others
USA v. Quincetta Cargill
as 22-13587
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
QUINCETTA Y. CARGILL, a.k.a. Queen, a.k.a. Tonya, a.k.a. Antela Scott, a.k.a. Angela Scott, a.k.a. Quincet Tucker, a.k.a. Quincetta Tucker
Cargill v. Jacquez
as 2:2022cv01288
Petitioner:
Quincetta Y Cargill
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Quincetta Cargill v. Israel Jacquez
as 22-35671
Petitioner / Appellant:
QUINCETTA Y. CARGILL
Respondent / Appellee:
ISRAEL JACQUEZ, Warden, Federal Detention Center - SeaTac
Cargill v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Y Cargill
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph R Biden, Jr, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00900
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In re: Quincetta Cargill
as 22-10555
Petitioner:
In re: QUINCETTA Y. CARGILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
