Espinoza v. Barron et al
jacqueline espinoza |
H. Barron, C. Peters, H Barron and C Peters |
2:2023cv00967 |
June 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
John H Chun |
Theresa L Fricke |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND ANSWER, 28 U.C.S. 2241 PETITION. Within 30 days of the date this Order is posted, respondent(s) shall show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted by filing a return. Signed by Judge Theresa L Fricke. (AMD)(cc: Petitioner) |
Filing 5 ORDER APPOINTING FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER. Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is GRANTED. Dkt. #2 . The Court appoints the Federal Public Defender to represent Petitioner in these proceedings. Signed by Judge Theresa L Fricke.(AMD)(cc: Petitioner) |
Filing 4 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc: Petitioner via USPS) (CR) |
Judge Theresa L Fricke added. (CR) |
Judge John H. Chun added. (CR) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel , filed by Petitioner jacqueline espinoza. Noting Date 6/29/2023, (Endo, Corey) Modified on 6/30/2023 re-generated notice to AUSA (CR). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # AWAWDC-8068701) filed by jacqueline espinoza.(Endo, Corey) Modified on 6/30/2023 re-generated notice to AUSA (CR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.