Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Angel v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Kandy Angel
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Cox, et al. v. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Inc., et al.
as 24-2763
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, in her official capacity as the Director of Oregon Department of Corrections, ASSOCIATION OF OREGON CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES, INC., OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY COX, MARK COX, YVONNE WILLIAMS and others
Reid (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01114
Petitioner:
Richard Reid
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, English, A. Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paw v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
April Paw
Respondent:
Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aguayo v. Peters et al
as 7:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Bertha Aguayo
Defendant:
C Peters and Warden K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Olaiya v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00338
Petitioner:
Temitope Olaiya
Respondent:
Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moon v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Chesley Moon
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Parviz v. Barron, et al.
as 24-1315
Respondent:
HOWARD C. BARRON, Warden, Federal Detention Center Sea Tac, COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, H. Barron and others
Petitioner:
MAHSA PARVIZ
Martin v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Candice Cherie Martin
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera-Garcia v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Abigal Rivera-Garcia
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
