LeAir v. Pierce County et al
Sebastian Grey LeAir |
Pierce County, NaphCare, Smith, Masaudrea, Miller, Desmond, Peck, Severson, Byrer, Kim and Sweeney |
3:2023cv05738 |
August 16, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
S Kate Vaughan |
Thomas S Zilly |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Sebastian Grey LeAir (CR) |
Case Reassigned to Judge Thomas S. Zilly and referred to Hon. S. Kate Vaughan as related to 3:23-cv-05399-TSZ-SKV. Judge Richard A. Jones and Hon. Brian A. Tsuchida no longer assigned to the case. (VE) |
Filing 3 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Sebastian Grey LeAir against defendant(s) Byrer, Desmond, Kim, Masaudrea, Miller, NaphCare, Peck, Pierce County, Severson, Smith, Sweeney with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 200002847) (CR) |
FILING FEE RECEIVED: $ 402.00, receipt number 200002847 (CR) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Application. ***Action Required*** Prison Trust Account Statement.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 9/18/2023 to correct IFP application (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (CR) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION To Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Sebastian Grey LeAir. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint) (CR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.