Cases 1 - 10 of 2,353
Thomas et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Walter Thomas and Desmond Bailey
Defendant:
Victor Hill and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knisley-Desmond v. Riverside Recovery of Tampa, LLC
as 8:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Carl M. Knisley-Desmond
Defendant:
Riverside Recovery of Tampa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Conrad v. United States
as 24-1933
Petitioner:
William Desmond Conrad
Respondent:
United States of America
Lawson et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lawson, Gabe Hart, Victor Ashe and others
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Goins, Steven R. Finney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JULIEN et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv60706
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA JULIEN and DESMOND JULIEN
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Adam Fried v. Jose Garcia
as 24-3330
Plaintiff:
ADAM M. FRIED, Administrator of the Estate of Desmond Franklin
Defendant:
JOSE GARCIA
Stueben v. Meade et al
as 5:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stueben
Defendant:
Desmond Meade, Contrina Vaughn, Steve Cowart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Shields et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Desmond Shields and Jasmine Shields
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. LaRou et al
as 2:2024cv10960
Plaintiff:
Desmond A. Williams
Defendant:
Madison LaRou, Johnson and Hawkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
