Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Desmond et al v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Desmond and Jose Moreta
Defendant:
Robert May, Jason Schaffer, Andrew Peruchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gervat v. Narayen et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse Brett Biggs, Melanie Boulden and others
Shah v. Narayen et al
as 1:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse, Brett Biggs and others
Nominal Defendant:
Adobe Inc.
Samuel et al v. Centene Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Harry Samuel, Christopher Robert Desmond and Arthur Govan
Defendant:
Centene Corporation, Centurion of Delaware LLC, VitalCore Health Strategies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Desmond Sheppard
Defendant:
State of Delaware, Office of Defense Services, Sussex County Office of The Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00420
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Desmond v. Klopp et al
as 1:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Justin Atherholt, John Doe, Michael Stafford and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Desmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desmond v. State Of Delaware
as 1:2020cv00046
Respondent:
State Of Delaware
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Desmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00866
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Desmond v. Connections Medical Services et al
as 1:2018cv01828
Respondent:
Warden Dana Metzger, Attorney General Matthew Denn and Connections Medical Services
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Desmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
