Venizelos v. Saad
Petitioner: John Venizelos
Respondent: Jennifer Saad
Case Number: 3:2018cv00119
Filed: July 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Office: Martinsburg Office
County: Gilmer
Presiding Judge: Gina M Groh
Referring Judge: Robert W Trumble
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE by Jennifer Saad of Mootness (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Reisenweber, Erin)
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 9/11/2018. (tlg)
September 5, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Petitioner's Petition by Jennifer Saad. (Reisenweber, Erin)
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 8/9/2018. Copy sent to AUSA.(tlg) (Main Document 8 replaced on 8/9/2018) (tlg).
August 8, 2018 Filing 7 Pro hac vice filing fee: $ 200.00, receipt number WVNM001356 (tlg)
August 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Gina M. Groh on 8/7/2018. (tlg)
August 6, 2018 Filing 5 Application For Admission Pro Hac Vice of Todd Bussert filed by John Venizelos. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Collias, Gary) Modified to change event to motion on 8/6/2018 (tlg).
July 30, 2018 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by John Venizelos re #3 Other Document, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,,, . (Collias, Gary)
July 30, 2018 Filing 3 Exhibit 14 Other Document re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,,, filed by John Venizelos. (Collias, Gary)
July 30, 2018 Filing 2 VERIFICATION OF ATTORNEY ADMISSION as to Todd Bussert. (tlg)
July 30, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Jennifer Saad, filed by John Venizelos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, administrative detention order; #2 Exhibit 2, memorandum; #3 Exhibit 3, incident report; #4 Exhibit 4, statement of John Venizelos; #5 Exhibit 5, discipline hearing officer report; #6 Exhibit 6, regional administrative remedy appeal; #7 Exhibit 7, response; #8 Exhibit 8, central office administrative remedy appeal; #9 Exhibit 9, response; #10 Exhibit 10, letter; #11 Exhibit 11, letter and attachments; #12 Exhibit 12, Freedom of Information Act appeal; #13 Exhibit 13, letter and hearing worksheet; #14 Civil Cover Sheet).(tlg) Modified on 7/30/2018 (tlg). Filing Fee PAID $5.00 Receipt #0424-2636018

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Venizelos v. Saad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jennifer Saad
Represented By: Helen Campbell Altmeyer
Represented By: Erin K. Reisenweber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Venizelos
Represented By: Todd Bussert
Represented By: Gary A. Collias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?